So Penning’s Folly opens today.

This is the national Maritime Operations Centre.  It started life being commissioned as the National Fire Service Control Centre.  The idea was that anyone dialling 999 and asking for ‘Fire’ got routed to this centre.  Details of the location and nature of the fire would be recorded in Fareham and fire engines would be mustered from the local station.  After some consideration, the fire service said it was not feasible to run the fire service safely from a national centre.  So it was allocated to the Coastguard instead.

Now forgive me, but buildings have names and numbers.  They are on roads that also have names or numbers, as are landmarks like woods, forests and heathland, which can catch fire.  And fires may spread, but the addresses they start at do not move.  Compare that to an emergency on our coast. A holidaymaker on a hired boat sends up a flare and someone dials 999 asking for ‘Coastguard’, being put through to Penning’s Folly in deepest Hampshire.  If the caller is not a visitor, they may know where they are and possibly where the flare came from.  Or maybe not.  And even if the operator in Fareham knows the difference between two similar sounding coastal villages in any part of theUK, could they identify the ‘big rock’ that’s described to them as near where the flare came from?  And bear in mind, the casualty will be constantly moving with tides and currents, while someone inFarehamtries to work out which local team is nearest and – wait for it – co-ordinate the searching at Penning’s Folly!

They say the changes are making the Coastguard service more ‘modern’ and ‘robust’.  True they are developing a new IT system to ensure all the local centres that are left can have access to all incident data.  Assuming the new system works and is delivered on time, this would be a benefit whether you have the 9 centres they propose to keep or the 18 centres they have at the moment.  It doesn’t in itself enable 9 centres to operate as effectively as 18.  It’s NOT as robust to share work between 9 centres compared with 18 – the maths just don’t make that work.  In fact it is exactly half as robust, of course.

The Welsh Assembly and Scottish Parliament have both said they are unhappy that there has been no risk assessment of the closure of specific centres, and have even offered to contribute to the cost of undertaking the.  After all there is still time, with Swansea not due to close until 2015, for example.  Arrogance wins over common sense, with Penning declaring they’ve done a ‘general’ risk assessment and that’s good enough for him.  Easy to say for a minister whose constituency is landlocked.  But it will be conservative voters as well as others, from Penning’s Hemel Hempstead constituency as well as the rest of the UK, whose lives are being put at real risk by these senseless closures.

Written by Tim Douglas.

Today’s the day for a Ministerial jolly 
at the grand inauguration of Mike Penning’s Folly.
A quiet affair for fear of reality
that Penning’s plans will cause fatality
 
He ignored the calls for the plan to be scrapped
in order for his moment when hands will be clapped.
But when lives are lost because he didn’t listen
he must then face the tears as they glisten.
 
No joy today for a service long and proud
as truth of closure plans are lost in a cloud..
Whatever the cost of human life
Penning’s Folly will lead to strife.
 
Not even now is it too late to be brave
scarp the plans so that lives may be saved.
Be a man Penning, so you can sleep at night
because there will be no surrender without a fight!
 
Written by a fledgling poet! 

4 Comments

  1. Sir Alan Massey, the MCA’s chief executive, added: ‘We are seeking to keep as many of our current coastguards who are in the centres that are closing as possible.

    ‘They carry local knowledge, knowledge of all our procedures, and where we can entice from centres that are closing, we will.’

    Those few words speak volumes to today’s proceedings, Sir Alan has the most sense of what is happening than anyone, yet he failed to fully endorse Mike Penning’s words at the hand-over.

    Sir Alan chose to mention the extremely difficult task of attracting the experienced & knowledgeable staff from the closing stations to the MOC (knowing many have said they will not move).

    A fact that has come to light recently from Freedom of Information questions; the Coastguard Service is critically understaffed as people leave in preference to either moving or staying in stations that cannot cope.

    In just mere weeks when the first stations close, there will be a dramatic loss of yet more experience & knowledge and this will continue to plummet with each closing station.

    Mike Penning assured the House of Commons that NO Station would close until the MOC was proven & viable, which is some time in the future, with no Guarantee it will work because it is all based on an untested theory.

    God help anyone needing HMCG in the near future.

  2. An excellent article, well written and considering both sides. “Sicknote Penning” as he was known in Essex Fire Service, cannot be trusted as he blatantly lied to the House of Commons when announcing the closures! The MCA now have an empty building with no money to put equipment in it and no staff willing to man it. Indeed, staff had to be threatened with the sack unless they attended the opening today. The game is afoot Watson and far from over! Keep up the excellent work and the pressure will tell.

  3. I’m sorry to call names, but Mike Penning suffers from extreme arrogance, and that shouldn’t be allowed to determine the safety of our coastal communities and visitors. It is inconceivable that a call centre in Hampshire will effectively be able to cope with an emergency in west Wales, or Cornwall, or Scotland, even to the extent of correctly forwarding the emergency to the correct incidence centre. Absolutely insane and dangerous

  4. ah, mister penning, the abomiable no man, who threatened to deal with any member of staff who opposed him. what a charming chappie. the man who said he would listen to peoples concerns then ignored them. there were thousand of people shouting, but the minister was only prepared to listen with his mouth.

  5. Pingback: Mike Penning “.. a regional structure will put lives at risk ..” | CoastguardSOS

  6. Pingback: Why the jewels in our crown will become poisoned chalices « thatspr

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


2 + 5 =

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>